Pollution Patrol is a STEM lesson plan geared toward creating awareness about air pollution by designing, building and testing their own pollution detectors using a variety of common materials.
The lesson begins by discussing air pollution, particulate matter, and air quality rating. The students are then introduced to the engineering design process via video. After watching the video, they are presented with the design challenge and its parameters. The students work in groups of 2-3 to design their detector and present it to the class. After construction, the air pollution detectors are placed in different locations around the school and students collect, analyze and graph their findings. As a culminating activity students complete a reflection sheet.
The focus of this resource is building STEM competencies.
Pollution Patrol is an excellent STEM resource for the middle school classroom combining math and science outcomes. The resource addresses curriculum outcomes related to pollution, human impacts on the environment and data management.
The following tool will allow you to explore the relevant curriculum matches for this resource. To start, select a province listed below.
Principle | Rating | Explanation |
---|---|---|
Consideration of Alternative Perspectives | Very Good | As this is a STEM lesson the students are presented with the necessary background information needed to proceed to build using their own ideas, an outdoor air pollution detector. |
Consideration of Alternative Perspectives:
| ||
Multiple Dimensions of Problems & Solutions | Poor/Not considered | The focus of this lesson is really on the design process with attention to air pollution. In that respect, the economic and social dimensions of the issue are not addressed. |
Multiple Dimensions of Problems & Solutions: Effectively addresses the environmental, economic and social dimensions of the issue(s) being explored.
| ||
Respects Complexity | Good | The students are introduced to the concept behind the engineering design process. They are encouraged to design, test and re-design if needed, just as engineers do when trying to solve design issues. |
Respects Complexity: The complexity of the problems/issues being discussed is respected. | ||
Acting on Learning | Poor/Not considered | The focus of this resource is to build STEM skills and competencies. |
Acting on Learning: Learning moves from understanding issues to working towards positive change — in personal lifestyle, in school, in the community, or for the planet
| ||
Values Education | Very Good | The students are given the opportunity to explore their own ideas and thoughts on the design of the outdoor air pollution detector. They are encouraged to re-design if needed. |
Values Education: Students are explicitly provided with opportunities to identify, clarify and express their own beliefs/values. | ||
Empathy & Respect for Humans | Poor/Not considered | This is not a focus of this resource. |
Empathy & Respect for Humans: Empathy and respect are fostered for diverse groups of humans (including different genders, ethnic groups, sexual preferences, etc.). | ||
Personal Affinity with Earth | Very Good | As the outdoor air pollution detector allows the students to collect first-hand data regarding the air quality around their school, this will allow them to gain an understanding of the air quality in their area. |
Personal Affinity with Earth: Encourages a personal affinity with -the natural world.
| ||
Locally-Focused Learning | Very Good | The placement of the detectors in the areas around the school allows for the students to collect data relevant to their lives. |
Locally-Focused Learning: Includes learning experiences that take advantage of issues/elements within the local community.
| ||
Past, Present & Future | Poor/Not considered | A sense of the present is addressed with this resource. It does not discuss the past nor does it address the future. |
Past, Present & Future: Promotes an understanding of the past, a sense of the present, and a positive vision for the future. |
Principle | Rating | Explanation |
---|---|---|
Open-Ended Instruction | Very Good | The students are encouraged to think for themselves. They brainstorm, develop and test their ideas and then share them with the class. |
Open-Ended Instruction
: Lessons are structured so that multiple/complex answers are possible; students are not steered toward one 'right' answer. | ||
Integrated Learning | Very Good |
|
Integrated Learning: Learning brings together content and skills from more than one subject area
| ||
Inquiry Learning | Good | The students are provided with the design challenge and the materials. They then proceed to create their own design and find solutions to the problems they may encounter. |
Inquiry Learning: Learning is directed by questions, problems, or challenges that students work to address.
| ||
Differentiated Instruction | Good | This resource with its approach to the activity addresses very well the needs of most learners; however, there are no suggestions for accommodations for those students who may experience difficulties with the content. |
Differentiated Instruction: Activities address a range of student learning styles, abilities and readiness.
| ||
Experiential Learning | Very Good | This resource involves students in a hands-on approach to an important and authentic issue. |
Experiential Learning: Authentic learning experiences are provided
| ||
Cooperative Learning | Satisfactory | Students work in groups. |
Cooperative Learning: Group and cooperative learning strategies are a priority.
| ||
Assessment & Evaluation | Good | There is a student worksheet provided with reflection questions that can be used as an assessment tool. It would be beneficial for the teacher to create a rubric based on the design constraints and other important criteria. |
Assessment & Evaluation: Tools are provided that help students and teachers to capture formative and summative information about students' learning and performance. These tools may include reflection questions, checklists, rubrics, etc. | ||
Peer Teaching | Satisfactory | The resource invites students to write a letter about air pollution in their community to their local politician. |
Peer Teaching: Provides opportunities for students to actively present their knowledge and skills to peers and/or act as teachers and mentors.
| ||
Case Studies | Poor/Not considered | This is not a part of the lesson plan. |
Case Studies: Relevant case studies are included. Case studies are thorough descriptions of real events from real situations that students use to explore concepts in an authentic context. | ||
Locus of Control | Very Good | The students are allowed autonomy in creating their design. There are links and resources provided should the class, teacher or individual student wish to explore the issue further. |
Locus of Control: Meaningful opportunities are provided for students to choose elements of program content, the medium in which they wish to work, and/or to go deeper into a chosen issue. |