- Home
- Tutorial
- Resource Guides
- Focus Areas
- LSF Programs
-
Professional
Development - Review Process
-
A project of LSF
Climate change, unsustainable use of natural resources and increased global energy demands mean that humans must reduce fossil fuel consumption in order to protect the health of our planet. Nuclear energy can provide reliable, low carbon electricity but is expensive to develop and produces radioactive waste. This lesson introduces students to the science of nuclear power and involves them in an analysis of the benefits and risks associated with this alternative energy source. Learners research and evaluate scientific information and participate in structured discussions to reach a consensus regarding the replacement of a coal burning power plant with a nuclear facility in the fictional town of "Solutionville". The resource emphasizes critical thinking, evidence-based reasoning and media literacy as students complete the following learning objectives:
This resource supports Grade 6-8 Science content related to greenhouse gas emissions, climate change, alternative energy sources and natural resources. Nuclear energy concepts such as fission, fusion, radioactive waste and atomic theory are explored from the context of understanding nuclear reactions. Students also actively practice research and analysis skills as they examine the environmental, social and economic considerations associated with nuclear power.
This lesson could also introduce an action project focused on reducing energy consumption. Students might conduct a home or school energy audit and develop a community awareness campaign that provides power conservation tips and encourages environmental responsibility. Natural Resources Canada provides a great collection of tips for energy conservation here.
The following tool will allow you to explore the relevant curriculum matches for this resource. To start, select a province listed below.
| Principle | Rating | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Consideration of Alternative Perspectives | Very Good | Research, analysis and informed conclusions are central to all of the activities, providing a framework for the independent evaluation of the benefits and risks of nuclear energy. Students participate in an authentic civic decision-making process that uses reflection and a class vote to arrive at a consensus. |
Consideration of Alternative Perspectives:
| ||
| Multiple Dimensions of Problems & Solutions | Good | The resource addresses the environmental impacts of nuclear energy by comparing greenhouse gas emissions from nuclear power and traditional coal-burning energy plants alongside information about radioactive waste. Economic aspects are clearly outlined through content about increased employment, construction costs and maintenance and decommissioning expenses. Students also consider the potential social implications of long-term radioactivity from the perspective of how technological advances such as nuclear fusion can improve safety. |
| Multiple Dimensions of Problems & Solutions: Effectively addresses the environmental, economic and social dimensions of the issue(s) being explored.
| ||
| Respects Complexity | Good | Learners will understand that although nuclear energy is reliable and can reduce emissions, there are significant concerns about radioactivity and nuclear accidents. Pupils learn that local communities, Indigenous perspectives and valuable natural areas are important considerations in decisions regarding the construction and placement of new nuclear facilities. |
| Respects Complexity: The complexity of the problems/issues being discussed is respected. | ||
| Acting on Learning | Poor/Not considered | Students are not directly involved in environmental action, but will develop an awareness of the connection between energy production and climate change. |
| Acting on Learning: Learning moves from understanding issues to working towards positive change — in personal lifestyle, in school, in the community, or for the planet
| ||
| Values Education | Good | Learners are able to explore the benefits and risks, reflect on evidence, and make a personal decision about nuclear energy. The final vote and discussion encourage students to articulate which factors matter most to them when evaluating environmental choices. |
| Values Education: Students are explicitly provided with opportunities to identify, clarify and express their own beliefs/values. | ||
| Empathy & Respect for Humans | Poor/Not considered | Although not specifically included in the lesson, students will recognize that the development of new energy infrastructure can negatively impact communities and their citizens. |
| Empathy & Respect for Humans: Empathy and respect are fostered for diverse groups of humans (including different genders, ethnic groups, sexual preferences, etc.). | ||
| Personal Affinity with Earth | Satisfactory | Discussions surrounding impacts such as emissions, resource and nuclear waste develop awareness of human impacts on the environment, but direct interactions with the natural world are not an essential element of this lesson. |
| Personal Affinity with Earth: Encourages a personal affinity with -the natural world.
| ||
| Locally-Focused Learning | Poor/Not considered | A teacher could add local context by including regional examples of power facilities and associated environmental concerns. |
| Locally-Focused Learning: Includes learning experiences that take advantage of issues/elements within the local community.
| ||
| Past, Present & Future | Good | The lesson focuses on the connection between current climate change issues and the burning of fossil fuels, while considering how alternative energy sources significantly reduce emissions and help prevent further global temperature increases. |
| Past, Present & Future: Promotes an understanding of the past, a sense of the present, and a positive vision for the future. | ||
| Principle | Rating | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Open-Ended Instruction | Good | Students research, discuss, and evaluate evidence to form and defend their own positions, while also developing skills in assessing source credibility. |
| Open-Ended Instruction
: Lessons are structured so that multiple/complex answers are possible; students are not steered toward one 'right' answer. | ||
| Integrated Learning | Satisfactory | Science content about energy systems is combined with Social Studies and English Language Arts skills such as evaluating evidence from various sources, considering economic and social impacts, and making informed civic decisions. |
| Integrated Learning: Learning brings together content and skills from more than one subject area
| ||
| Inquiry Learning | Good | The lesson provides opportunities for discovery as students are able to explore information from multiple sources, describe their own ideas and develop conclusions through discussion and evidence rather than direct instruction. |
| Inquiry Learning: Learning is directed by questions, problems, or challenges that students work to address.
| ||
| Differentiated Instruction | Poor/Not considered | The lesson does not include any differentiation strategies for students who may struggle with the complex written and visual content. |
| Differentiated Instruction: Activities address a range of student learning styles, abilities and readiness.
| ||
| Experiential Learning | Satisfactory | Students are actively engaged in research, discussion and decision making as residents of the fictional town of "Solutionville". The lesson could be made more authentic with a regional example of a community that may be facing a similar proposed development. |
| Experiential Learning: Authentic learning experiences are provided
| ||
| Cooperative Learning | Satisfactory | Students work in groups and participate in whole-class discussions. |
| Cooperative Learning: Group and cooperative learning strategies are a priority.
| ||
| Assessment & Evaluation | Satisfactory | Reflection questions, research notes, participation in the class chart, and the final vote are used as fomative assessment tools, but a summary task and rubric are not included. |
| Assessment & Evaluation: Tools are provided that help students and teachers to capture formative and summative information about students' learning and performance. These tools may include reflection questions, checklists, rubrics, etc. | ||
| Peer Teaching | Satisfactory | Students share information between groups and participate in building a class consensus through active dialogue. |
| Peer Teaching: Provides opportunities for students to actively present their knowledge and skills to peers and/or act as teachers and mentors.
| ||
| Case Studies | Satisfactory | Although the lesson centres around an imaginary community, the benefit/risk analysis and consensus building are all authentic to any type of proposed large-scale development project that may affect local citizens and the environment. |
| Case Studies: Relevant case studies are included. Case studies are thorough descriptions of real events from real situations that students use to explore concepts in an authentic context. | ||
| Locus of Control | Good | Students are able to research and gather information from print and digital sources to argue and defend their point of view. This supports independent exploration and analysis of the topic. |
| Locus of Control: Meaningful opportunities are provided for students to choose elements of program content, the medium in which they wish to work, and/or to go deeper into a chosen issue. | ||